How do I convince our top management to adopt ISO 9001: 2015 for our quality management system (QMS)?
I think it’s not so much about trying to convince top
management than getting them to consider the possible benefits of adopting the
standard against the resource requirements and the work involved. As with most
major business decisions, the organization would do well to look at things
objectively and in an impartial manner.
In a previous blog entry, I wrote about what I think to be
valid reasons for an organization to decide to get certified.1 Should
the organization be facing any of the three reasons I mentioned, it would make
a lot of sense to adopt ISO 9001 and apply for certification in the shortest
time possible. However, getting the organization to adopt ISO 9001 as the
standard for its quality management system is in itself a major decision
regardless whether the organization opts to get certified later on or not.
Clause 5 of the ISO standard requires commitment of the
organization’s top management and makes them accountable towards the effective
implementation of the QMS. On a personal note, I have also observed how the effectiveness of the QMS is largely proportional to the level of involvement of top
management in the QMS processes. Given all the above, it is essential to get
the buy-in of top management in supporting the QMS and, at the minimum, get
their participation in QMS processes as required by the International Standard
before embarking on the journey of aligning the existing QMS with ISO 9001.
The International Organization for Standardization released
a publication2 which enumerated some of the benefits of using ISO
9001 which I also mention below:
Improved assessment of the overall context of the organization
Clause 4 of the ISO 9001 standard follows the general
framework of risk management and starts with the context of the organization. By
knowing its context, the organization can determine what external and internal issues
can affect its ability to achieve the goals of its QMS. Many organizations are
already applying this when they use the PESTLE framework or SWOT analysis
during strategic planning, but ISO 9001 formalizes the requirement to ensure
that organizations are aware of the many issues that introduce risks and
opportunities to the QMS.
Aid in meeting legal requirements
Clause 4 requires organizations to understand who their interested
parties (i.e. stakeholders) are as well as the relevant needs and expectations of
these parties. Identification and evaluation of legal requirements is not an
explicit requirement in ISO 9001; however, government agencies and regulatory
bodies are also part of the interested parties and can affect how the
organization implements its QMS. As such, organizations can have a better
understanding on the legal requirements and can have better implementation of
processes to ensure legal compliance.
Enhanced identification and addressing of risks
Clause 6 proceeds from the identified external and internal issues
that can significantly affect the QMS and requires organizations to plan for
actions on how to address significant risks and opportunities. The standard has
not provided specific examples of these actions, but highlights the risk-based
approach that organization needs to have in order to better address their risks.
In addition, ISO 9001 requires that the action plans become integrated in the QMS
and their effectiveness evaluated. This helps to institutionalize effective
actions while enhancing capabilities to address ineffective actions.
Customer focus
Enhancing customer satisfaction is not just for the customer
relations personnel, but for the whole organization. ISO 9001 requires in
Clause 5 that top management takes the lead in ensuring that requirements of
customers and other interested parties are met, risks and opportunities that
can affect conformity of products and services are addressed, and commitment to
enhancing customer satisfaction is evident. Level of customer satisfaction is required
to be monitored in Clause 9 and opportunities to address future needs and
expectations is required to be determined in Clause 10.
Better process efficiency
Several requirements in the International Standard aid in
improving process efficiency. First, having a process approach in the quality management
system enables the organization to focus on its intended outcomes. For example,
having a quality policy to serve as framework for quality objectives ensures
alignment of processes to the main goals of the QMS. Second, applying operational controls as well as
monitoring and measurement helps reduce nonconforming products and services by keeping
processes within specific criteria. Third, resources needed for the proper provision
of products and services need to be available and used by the QMS.
Expansion into new markets
Many customers include certification to ISO 9001 as part of its requirements
before a supplier is included in its accredited vendor list. For example,
the automotive industry requires suppliers to be certified to ISO 9001 as the
minimum requirement prior to vendor accreditation. Organizations certified by a
third party assessor can also make use of their certification as evidence that
they are operating a world class QMS, making their QMS a competitive advantage
over their competitors.
The person/s presenting the proposal to top management to
adopt ISO 9001 will need to have at least a basic understanding of the
requirements of the standard and how the standard can be used to improve the
organization’s existing QMS. This becomes an important first step to getting top
management support and their commitment to the effective implementation of the
management system.
Notes
1Do organizations need to have their management
systems certified to ISO standards? https://askaconsultant.blogspot.com/2020/07/do-organizations-need-to-have-their.html?m=1
2 International Organization for Standardization (2015). Reaping the benefits of ISO 9001. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/publication/PUB100369.html.

Comments
Post a Comment